Over the past two decades, crowdfunding has evolved into one of the most influential alternative financial instruments at the global level. One of its most notable forms is crowdfunding-based microlending, which enables individuals from around the world to contribute small amounts to support micro and small enterprises. This model not only expands access to capital but also strengthens entrepreneurial ecosystems in regions previously marginalized by the formal banking system (Putri & Wibisono, 2021; Larasati, Hasan, Amelia, & Gunawan, 2025).

This development is driven by the inclusive nature of crowdfunding–P2P lending, which opens opportunities for anyone, both individuals and SMEs, to obtain financing. This aligns with the findings of Wahjono, Marina, and Widayat (2023), who emphasize the relevance of crowdfunding for SMEs, including in Muslim-majority countries, as it can be adapted to local social and religious values. Thus, this instrument serves not only as a financial mechanism but also as a means of social and cultural empowerment.

Technological advancements have further strengthened the role of microlending. Óskarsdóttir, Bravo, Sarraute, Baesens, and Vanthienen (2020) highlight that smartphone-based credit scoring can enhance financial inclusion, particularly in developing countries without established banking infrastructure. This digital approach enables more accurate credit risk prediction while bridging the gap between borrowers and investors.

From the perspective of investor motivation, Allison, Davis, Short, and Webb (2015) distinguish between intrinsic motivations, such as social concern, and extrinsic motivations, such as financial returns. The combination of these drivers makes crowdfunding microlending a hybrid instrument that merges social objectives with economic benefits. This is evident in global platforms such as Kiva, which connects donors in developed countries with borrowers in developing ones, demonstrating how small contributions from thousands of individuals can generate significant impact.

Beyond social and technological aspects, data protection has become a critical issue in the sustainability of P2P lending. Anggaredho, Prihatni, and Gurendrawati (2025) argue that protecting personal data is not merely a regulatory matter but also central to maintaining public trust. Without strong governance, data breaches could hinder industry growth.

Other global challenges arise during times of crisis. Khaliq (2025) shows that the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the stability of fintech lending, including an increased risk of default. This underscores the need for risk mitigation strategies and resilience among platforms in facing uncertain external conditions.

The integration of crowdfunding–microlending with direct marketing strategies has also become crucial in expanding outreach. Direct marketing connects borrowers with investors through campaigns tailored to specific needs—for example, targeting farming groups while linking them to agricultural product marketing. Reskiyah, Darman, Munawarah, and Risendy (2024) emphasize that the success of fintech lending depends on the efficiency of the link between borrowers and lenders, something that direct marketing approaches can effectively enhance.

Overall, crowdfunding for microlending has emerged as a key pillar of global financial inclusion. With the support of digital innovation, adaptive regulation, and effective marketing strategies, this model holds the potential to deliver broad socio-economic impact. The next stage should focus on analyzing business models and implementation strategies to ensure that this instrument can achieve long-term sustainability at the international level.

Business Models of Crowdfunding for Microlending in a Global Perspective

Crowdfunding in the form of microlending has not only emerged as a solution for financial inclusion but has also given rise to diverse business models tailored to global contexts. Variations in regulation, financial literacy, and digital infrastructure readiness across countries create unique operational strategies. Broadly, there are two main models in crowdfunding microlending: the non-profit model and the for-profit model.

1. Non-profit Model

Platforms such as Kiva represent the non-profit model that emphasizes social impact. Investors or donors channel funds without expecting financial returns, but rather to support borrowers in improving their livelihoods. Kiva collaborates with local microfinance institutions to disburse funds to communities. According to Kiva’s 2023 report, the platform has disbursed more than USD 1.8 billion across 77 countries, with over 80% of loans directed to women entrepreneurs. This demonstrates that crowdfunding can serve as a tool to address gender inequality in financial access.

2. For-profit Model

In contrast, the for-profit model allows investors to earn financial returns. An example is Funding Circle in the UK and the United States, which connects individual investors with SMEs seeking business capital. Investors receive interest on loans, while borrowers gain faster access to financing with more flexible terms compared to traditional banks. Allison et al. (2015) emphasize that this model tends to attract investors with extrinsic motivations, namely seeking profit while diversifying their portfolios.

Integration of Direct Marketing

Regardless of profit orientation, marketing strategies play a crucial role in the success of crowdfunding microlending. Global campaigns increasingly leverage digital direct marketing, such as social media, email marketing, and personalization algorithms. This approach allows platforms to target investors with specific preferences such as environmentally friendly projects, women’s empowerment, or agricultural technology innovation (Wahjono, Marina, & Widayat, 2023). Such strategies function not only as promotion but also as a means of building a global community with shared visions.

Moreover, direct marketing can be enriched with technology-driven personalization. Óskarsdóttir, Bravo, Sarraute, Baesens, and Vanthienen (2020) demonstrate that smartphone-based credit scoring can provide accurate data on borrowers’ repayment capacity. Consequently, marketing campaigns can be more precisely directed for instance, offering low-interest loans to low-risk borrowers or integrating financial education programs for high-risk borrowers.

The case of Grameen Bank in Bangladesh is also relevant. Although not initially based on digital crowdfunding, Grameen proved that providing collateral-free loans to women in villages could significantly reduce poverty levels. This principle has since been adapted in various global crowdfunding platforms, now strengthened by blockchain technology and artificial intelligence to enhance transparency.

Global Regulation and Challenges

From a regulatory perspective, Europe adopted the European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation (ECSPR) in 2021, which sets security and transparency standards across EU member states. This regulation strengthens global investor trust. Conversely, in developing regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa, the greatest challenges remain low digital literacy and limited internet access. However, initiatives like M-Pesa in Kenya have shown that mobile-based financial services can significantly expand access to crowdfunding (Nurjanah, Ramly, & Zulhilmi, 2024).

Three Key Success Factors

The success of crowdfunding business models for microlending at the global level is influenced by three main factors:

1. Investor Motivation
   Investors can be driven by social motivations (e.g., women’s empowerment and poverty alleviation) or financial motivations (profit-seeking or investment diversification). A deep understanding of these motivations is crucial for platforms to design effective campaigns and business models (Putri & Wibisono, 2021).
2. Digital Marketing Strategy
   Digital marketing strategies include targeting investors based on preferences, persuasive project narratives, and online community building. In a global context, these strategies must transcend geographical boundaries and emotionally and financially connect investors with borrowers (Larasati, Hasan, Amelia, & Gunawan, 2025).
3. Regulatory Framework
   Clear regulations are a vital foundation for ensuring transaction security, protecting investors, and establishing platform legitimacy. Countries with transparent and adaptive regulations are more likely to attract global participation (Anggaredho, Prihatni, & Gurendrawati, 2025).

Global Challenges and Implementation Recommendations for Crowdfunding–Microlending

Although the integration of crowdfunding–microlending with direct marketing strategies holds great potential as a global financial inclusion instrument, several challenges must be anticipated before full implementation can be achieved. These challenges include regulatory issues, financial risks, data protection, digital literacy, investor motivation, and cross-country socio-economic factors.

1. International Regulation

Regulation is the primary barrier since each jurisdiction has different approaches toward fintech. Variations in rules on interest rates, consumer protection, and foreign ownership can hinder the cross-border expansion of platforms. Hutagalung (2024) emphasizes that the success of P2P lending largely depends on regulatory clarity and implementation mechanisms, while Nurjanah, Ramly, and Zulhilmi (2024) add that regulatory ambiguity increases the risk of moral hazard. In the European Union, the adoption of the European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation (ECSPR) demonstrates an effort toward harmonization. However, in many developing countries, regulations remain weak or underdeveloped, increasing compliance costs for global platforms.

2. Financial Risk and Default

Default risk remains a serious threat to the sustainability of microlending businesses. Putri and Wibisono (2021) note that the biggest challenge in fintech lending lies in borrowers’ inability to repay, which can undermine business continuity. To address this, innovations in credit scoring using alternative data are essential. Research by Óskarsdóttir et al. (2020) shows that smartphone data can enhance repayment prediction accuracy. Furthermore, global investor motivation is highly volatile, influenced by macroeconomic factors such as inflation, financial crises, or interest rates (Allison, Davis, Short, & Webb, 2015). If neither social nor financial incentives are met, platform liquidity risks increase.

3. Data Protection and Technological Risks

In the digital ecosystem, data security is a critical issue. Crowdfunding platforms typically process personal data, including alternative data for credit scoring. However, cross-border data processing raises the risk of information leakage and privacy misuse. Anggaredho, Prihatni, and Gurendrawati (2025) stress that failure to protect data can severely damage a platform’s global reputation. Therefore, international standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) should serve as the minimum benchmark, accompanied by advanced encryption technologies to maintain the trust of both investors and borrowers.

4. Digital Literacy and Financial Education

The success of crowdfunding–microlending in many countries is highly dependent on digital and financial literacy levels. Wahjono, Marina, and Widayat (2023) highlight that public understanding of new financial instruments is a key success factor. Low literacy can lead to misunderstandings, fund misuse, and decreased investor interest. Therefore, direct marketing strategies must include educational content to ensure borrowers use funds responsibly while investors develop realistic expectations about risks.

5. Socio-Economic Factors and Inequality

Socio-economic contexts also play a significant role in successful implementation. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fintech faced heavy pressure due to surging defaults and loan restructuring (Khaliq, 2025). This demonstrates that microlending business models must remain adaptive to global crises—whether health, economic, or geopolitical. At the same time, unequal access to the internet risks deepening the digital divide. Reskiyah et al. (2024) emphasize that without inclusive strategies, fintech may only serve relatively well-off groups, leaving marginalized communities behind.

6. Challenges in Global Direct Marketing

While direct marketing can broaden outreach, it also raises ethical and cultural challenges. Overly aggressive marketing may be perceived as exploitation of vulnerable groups. Additionally, cross-cultural campaigns often face barriers related to language, values, and social norms. Pristiyono, Kanchanawongpaisan, and Broto (2025) highlight that marketing strategies successful in one region may not necessarily be effective in another without cultural adaptation.

Global Implementation Recommendations

1. Standardization of International Regulation
   Establish multilateral frameworks regarding interest rates, transparency, and consumer protection to reduce legal fragmentation.
2. Innovation in Credit Scoring
   Integrate alternative data (e.g., digital activity and micro-transactions) to strengthen risk assessment accuracy and reduce default.
3. Global Data Protection 
   Adopt international data security standards (GDPR or equivalent) with strong encryption to safeguard trust.
4. Financial Education via Direct Marketing
   Ensure each marketing campaign includes culturally relevant educational materials.
5. Crisis Resilience
   Develop emergency mechanisms such as loan restructuring or repayment suspension to maintain platform stability in times of global uncertainty.

References

Abdul Khaliq. (2025). The impact of COVID-19 on FinTech Lending in Indonesia: Evidence from Interrupted Time Series Analysis. arXiv.

Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Short, J. C., & Webb, J. W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53–73.

Anggaredho, P. P., Prihatni, R., & Gurendrawati, E. (2025). Personal data protection in Indonesia’s Peer-to-Peer Lending: A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, 16(1), 11–18.

Bella Marcelina Putri, & Wibisono, C. H. (2021). Financial technology in Indonesia: Effect of risk on financial performance in Peer-To-Peer Lending. KINERJA, 26(2).

Hutagalung, H. B. (2024). Regulasi dan implementasi peer to peer lending di Indonesia. Jurnal Darma Agung, 32(6), 441–451.

Larasati, M., Hasan, D. N., Amelia, F., & Gunawan, A. (2025). Analysis of the development of Peer-to-Peer Lending in Indonesia and its impact on financial inclusion: A literature review. Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Multidisciplinary Research, 4(1), 101–110.

Nurjanah, Ramly, A., & Zulhilmi. (2024). Fintech dan keberlanjutan usaha mikro: Studi analisis pada Peer to Peer Lending. J-EBIS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam), 9(1), 79–96.

Óskarsdóttir, M., Bravo, C., Sarraute, C., Baesens, B., & Vanthienen, J. (2020). Credit scoring for good: Enhancing financial inclusion with smartphone-based microlending. arXiv.

Pristiyono, P., Kanchanawongpaisan, S., & Broto, B. E. (2025). Public acceptance of peer-to-peer lending as a digital payment in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(5), 3485–3496.

Putra, K. S. W. (2024). Kedudukan para pihak dalam aktivitas fintech peer to peer lending di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 7(1), 60–69.

Reskiyah, Darman, Munawarah, & Risendy, R. (2024). Fintech: Mapping the performance of peer to peer lending credit in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Advantage, 9(1).

Risna Kartika. (2020). Analisis Peer to Peer Lending di Indonesia. AKUNTABILITAS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Ekonomi, 11(2), 75–86.

Sentot Imam Wahjono, Marina, A., & Widayat. (2023). Critical analysis of crowdfunding to finance SMEs in Muslim countries. BALANCE: Economic, Business, Management and Accounting Journal, 13(1).